. Yes, but you'd get him for his offensive capabilities.

1. Should I Trade Matt Kemp For Macbook Pro
2. Should I Trade Matt Kemp For Machine
3. Should I Trade Matt Kemp For Mac 2017

Even with his terrible defense, he's still been worth 2 and a half fWAR the last 365 days. Sure, but with Benintendi and Chris Young in LF, they are still below average this season. I agree with that to a point. Kemp can't play CF and I wouldn't play him in RF, so it's all really about Benintendi.

If Benintendi doesn't start hitting for any power soon (He was under a.400 SLG when I looked yesterday), I don't believe adding Kemp and having some sort of rotation would kill his progression. As far as now and going forward, I don't believe Moreland is going to keep up what he's done all year, so Hanley could take some time at 1B while Kemp takes some time at DH, and then for 2018 Hanley could shift to 1B after Moreland is gone and Kemp could be the primary DH. Plexgear pixaver chrome ii for mac. I will admit I didn't watch much of Hanley at 1B last season, so I don't know if it he was truly a completely disaster or not out there, which could affect this entirely.

If the team is still in roughly the same spot with the same production out of LF and DH near mid to late July, will that matter to you as much?. If the Forbes article and Cots Contracts are right, they are over by about 2 million right now. However, I can see that being a concern going forward. Asked Thursday how his throwing’s coming along, Ramirez’s response said it all. “Why?” Ramirez said. “I just got to hit, man, right now.

And I think Mitch (Moreland) is doing a pretty good job. It’s coming along good, but my main thing right now, just drive people in.” Hanley literally doesn't want to play first base; Benintendi is 22 years old and came into the season as the #1 prospect in baseball. Jettisoning him from his starting role would be a huge mistake; just look at what happened to Xander Bogaerts in 2014 when he was replaced by Stephen Drew.

From the sound of it you haven't watched the team play at all, since Young has been platooning with Bradley Jr. And not Benintendi. The Hanley thing isn't surprising, but I didn't know if he and 1B were completely done or not. I just figured Hanley took over at DH with Papi retiring. That's also a fair point, but I feel that the Red Sox should be just as concerned with winning now as developing their great young talent. It's all a give and a take. I haven't, I'm not a Red Sox fan and don't watch them very often.

A lot of my reasoning is based off of team stats looking for teams with LF and/or DH situations that could be improved. Clearly I don't have as good of a view on the team because I am not a fan of the club, it just seemed like a situation that could work out pretty nicely, but there are some factors I did not consider. I appreciate everyone who has enlightened me a bit here, you obviously included.

The luxury tax is not something I considered (I will have to keep that in mind in the future), so that is a good point. I may be underestimating Kemp's trade value, but I don't think trading for him would be a really big move, and don't think it would cost a real building block or anything. But I could very well be wrong. The one thing I would say is that Hanley hasn't been just a bit worse than Kemp this year, but a good deal worse with the bat (160 wRC+ to 108). However Hanley has the ability to go nuts with the bat at any time, and it's really Moreland I would be worried about for the Red Sox. As someone who never saw him play anywhere but SS and 3B for the Dodgers, is Hanley a disaster at 1B?

Should I Trade Matt Kemp For Macbook Pro

I wrote about how the Braves should trade Matt Kemp, and I believe the Red Sox would be a prime target. So far this year their overall LF situation has performed below average offensively, as well as their DH situation. Of course you've got the former top prospect in baseball manning LF and Hanley Ramirez DHing, but both players have had little to no power. I write that trading for Kemp could allow for an interesting situation where the three players have a bit of a rotation. I'd love to hear some thoughts.

Was not going to play another game for the. The team spent the last three months actively trying to trade him after a domestic violence incident in April, and his on-field performance had been pathetic since last summer's trade. Many around the industry considered Olivera untradeable.

On Saturday, John Coppolella and the Braves got rid of Olivera. Instead of releasing him outright – as some thought they would upon reinstatement to the league – the team sent him to San Diego in exchange for veteran outfielder. The deal is pending review of medical records. The money is the biggest piece of all this; that's why the made the move. Is owed $28.5 million from 2017 to 2020.

Matt Kemp is owed $54 million from 2017 to 2019. The Padres will send $10-12 million to Atlanta, though that cash is the money the gave San Diego in their trade two years ago. That means, assuming the money is spread out evenly through the next three years, the Braves will pay Kemp about $8.5 million more per year than they would be paying Olivera. For what it's worth, Kemp's deal ends in 2019 while Olivera's ran through 2020. Is Kemp worth the additional $8.5 million in 2017, 2018 and 2019? I think you could argue it either way and I'd agree.

Kemp is not a very good player - tet's get that out of the way. He struggles in the outfield. He doesn't get on base. He swings and misses a lot. He's 32 and on the downslope of his career. He's had hip problems.

And he's expensive, even if the Padres and Dodgers help pay the bill. There are two things Kemp does well, both of which will help the Braves. He will bring some much-needed right-handed power to the lineup. Kemp has crushed 46 home runs the last two seasons while playing in spacious Petco Park. He's hit 23+ home runs the last seven years, including 23 this year with two months to go.

Should I Trade Matt Kemp For Machine

Away from Petco, Kemp's batting line is.257/.295/.465. That's probably what we can expect moving forward in Atlanta. The other situational thing Kemp does well is hit left-handed pitching. He's crushed lefties his entire career and continues to do so in 2016 with a.303/.340/.569 line. That will help.

I wonder if a platoon with in left field would make sense, assuming Kemp isn't dealt again this offseason. The Braves had dead weight in Olivera. The original trade to get him was a dumb one. Now, a few months after Coppy publicly acknowledged the trade was a bad one, Olivera is on his way out of town once again.

Olivera is unlikely to be a big leaguer moving forward, and he certainly wasn't getting the chance to be one in Atlanta. There's a chance the Padres designate Olivera for assignment upon completion of the deal. I understand why the Braves made the move. They wanted no part of a bad baseball player who beat up a woman three months ago. Matt Kemp isn't very good at this point, but he's someone that should be incrementally better than the current options. There's always the option of trading Kemp, too. I'm fine with the deal, especially with the Padres sending over a considerable amount of money.

Should I Trade Matt Kemp For Mac 2017

And to Hector Olivera: good riddance.