@Brian Thanks for the kind words. MacApp was written in Object Pascal, and thus didn't seem especially relevant to an answer focused on C. I suppose you could have used this framework from a C application in the same way that you interoperated with the Mac's native Pascal APIs (that was one of the challenges of a C compiler on the Mac—interoperating with Pascal idioms, like its prefixed strings), but I'm not sure how many software shops actually did this. Despite possible appearances, I wasn't actually involved in this development myself, having only been born some 5 years after the Mac! – Jun 28 '17 at 17:05. CodeWarrior could certainly target 68k processors, and by the time it was released, was pretty much what all developers were using, as tofro's comment on the question can attest.

Certainly if you found an older version of it, it could be a viable development system for a 68k-based Mac. The 68030 in the SE/30 is no slouch. But it may be kind of slow; I'm not sure, I don't have first-hand experience with it. You'd probably want to do the development on a newer Mac and just target the older one, that way you get the benefit of faster compiles, a more pleasant work environment, and even updated.

Download Applications Palm Pilot Compilation For Mac 2017

Download Applications Palm Pilot Compilation For Mac Free

– Jun 28 '17 at 17:07. Versions of the standard libraries and compiler toolchains (better optimizations, etc.). If you were going for period-correctness, or just wanted to play around, you probably would be better off with THINK C.

Download Applications Palm Pilot Compilation For Mac

THINK C 6 is fantastic on a 68k Mac, and I believe is what most retro-enthusiasts would use, if they weren't using a newer Mac to cross-compile. This is the last version before Symantec completely ruined it, in the eyes of many. Of course, it also lacks C support, which is a pretty big disadvantage for some, and a point in CodeWarrior's column. – Jun 28 '17 at 17:08.